Valepath

For investors and acquirers

Technology due diligence.
Grounded in execution.

Understand the technology risk behind the acquisition—and what it will take to realise the investment thesis.

For PE deal teams, operating partners and strategic acquirers. Valepath translates systems, team and delivery findings into remediation costs, investment implications and post-acquisition priorities.

Sample report: an illustrative assessment of a fictional LegalTech target.

When to engage

From initial screen to post-close priorities.

Choose the depth of assessment around the decision, target complexity and transaction timetable.

Before full diligence

Pre-LOI technology screen

An early view of material technology risks before committing to full diligence.

  • Architecture, security and AI red flags
  • Priority risks and unanswered questions
  • A concise decision memo and proposed scope for deeper review

Indicative window: 2–3 working days.

After acquisition

Post-close 100-day plan

Turn the findings into a programme the portfolio company can execute.

  • Sequenced workstreams and named owners
  • KPI baselines and governance cadence
  • Cost actions, integration priorities and delivery dependencies

Indicative window: 2–3 weeks to prepare the plan.

Delivery windows depend on scope, evidence availability and management access. Fees and timing are agreed after scoping. AI/IP risk and bolt-on readiness can also be scoped as focused reviews.

What you receive

Findings you can use in the decision.

Full diligence connects the technical assessment to the cost, sequence and practical implications of change.

01

Risk scorecard

An eight-dimension assessment identifying material findings, their supporting evidence and the gaps that remain.

02

Phased cost-to-fix

Remediation estimates sequenced by urgency, with assumptions, dependencies and uncertainty made explicit.

03

Executive summary

Investment-committee-ready conclusions: what supports the thesis, what threatens it and which conditions matter.

04

First-100-day priorities

A sequenced operational plan with proposed owners, dependencies and measures of progress.

05

Transaction implications

Technical findings translated into issues for the deal team and its advisers to consider in pricing, protections and integration planning.

06

Full diligence report

The evidence, assessment and recommendations brought together in a report the deal team can use before and after close.

Illustrative deliverable

See how a finding becomes a priority.

Review the existing sample report for a fictional LegalTech target: executive conclusions, dimension assessments, remediation costs and a first-100-day plan.

The company, findings and financial estimates in the sample are illustrative, not client results.

Download sample report ↓
Illustrative finding

Integration limits the acquisition thesis.

Evidence to examine
Tenant separation, interfaces and manual data reconciliation.
Investment consequence
Each bolt-on may require additional engineering effort, delaying integration and expected synergies.
Decision-ready output
A costed remediation sequence, explicit dependencies and an owner for the first integration milestone.

Assessment framework

Eight dimensions. One investment context.

The framework keeps the assessment systematic; the investment thesis determines which findings are material.

01

Architecture & infrastructure

System topology, technical debt, scalability, resilience and integration constraints.

02

Team & organisation

Key-person dependencies, capability gaps, outsourcing and ownership.

03

Security & compliance

Access controls, security practices, incident history and material compliance gaps.

04

Data & analytics

Data quality, governance, integration, privacy and reliability of management information.

05

AI & proprietary technology

Model dependencies, data provenance, IP governance and durability of technical advantage.

06

Cost structure

Technology spend, cloud and licence commitments, vendor exposure and cost-to-fix.

07

Delivery capability

Engineering practices, release reliability, quality assurance and roadmap execution.

08

Strategic alignment & bolt-on readiness

Fit with the investment thesis, integration effort and ability to support the business plan.

How it works

Scope. Assess. Read out.

01 / Scope the decision

Start with the thesis.

Agree the target, transaction context, key questions, required access, deliverables and timetable.

02 / Test the evidence

Establish what is material.

Review documentation, systems and management evidence. Investigate risks and quantify remediation effort, making evidence gaps explicit.

03 / Read out the implications

Make the findings usable.

Walk the deal team through the conclusions, cost-to-fix and post-close priorities. Resolve questions and agree any further work.

The operating experience behind the assessment

Recommendations informed by implementation.

Valepath’s transformation practice spans 80+ initiatives across nine industries since 2013. That experience informs the practical work of changing systems, organisations and operations.

The engagement can conclude with the diligence decision or continue into separately scoped implementation and capability transfer.

Discuss a transaction

Bring the target, thesis and timeline.

A brief description of the company, the decision you need to make and your deadline is enough to begin scoping.

Get in touch →